Primary Privacy Readings

Additional Privacy Readings

Primary Privacy Readings’ References

Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science (New York, N.Y.), 347, 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1465
Barocas, S., & Nissenbaum, H. (2014). Big data’s end run around procedural privacy protections. Communications of the ACM, 57, 31–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/2668897
Benn, C., & Lazar, S. (2021). What’s wrong with automated influence. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 52, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2021.23
Danks, D. (2014). A modern pascal’s wager for mass electronic surveillance. https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/6490751.V1
DeCew, J. (2018). Privacy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2018). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/privacy/; Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
McFarland, M. (2012). Why We Care about Privacy. https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/internet-ethics/resources/why-we-care-about-privacy/; Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University.
Mittelstadt, B. (2017). From individual to group privacy in big data analytics. Philosophy & Technology, 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0253-7
Privacy and Paternalism: The Ethics of Student Data Collection. (2022). https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/privacy-and-paternalism-the-ethics-of-student-data-collection/; The MIT Press Reader.
Rachels, J. (1975). Why privacy is important. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 4(4), 323–333. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265077
Schneier, B. (2007). Why ’Anonymous’ Data Sometimes Isn’t. https://www.wired.com/2007/12/why-anonymous-data-sometimes-isnt/; Wired.
Thomson, J. J. (1975). The right to privacy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 4(4), 295–314. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265075